Bard Puns (OCE)
: btw there are two Bard main clubs on OCE. Bard Mains and Time To Chime. ^.^ Add me if you want to be added to the groups :P
: >All the female champs were hypersexualized >Ignoring {{champion:89}},{{champion:1}},{{champion:429}}, {{champion:203}},{{champion:113}},{{champion:133}},{{champion:61}},{{champion:421}} and {{champion:254}}, not to mention all the muscled, shirtless, sexualized MALE champs. You should {{summoner:12}} back to tumblr. You won't be missed.
Further reading: http://gentlemangustaf.com/2014/03/15/gender-representation-in-league-of-legends/
: {{champion:89}} is unnecessarily sexualised in her Valkyrie skin (also in her classic skin she has boob armour which is inaccurate and unncessary), {{champion:1}} is a child, so it would be pretty messed up if she were sexualised, {{champion:429}} was one of the more refreshing and interesting designs because she wasn't sexualised, {{champion:203}} isn't a female champ but a dual-gendered spirit thing, {{champion:113}} isn't sexualised, you're right, which makes for a refershing change, {{champion:133}} is sexualised in her Woad Scout skin (SHE IS IN THE FRELJORD: WHY IS SHE WEARING A CROP TOP?), {{champion:61}} is not sexualised either, quite right, {{champion:421}} also makes for a refreshing change and {{champion:254}} is sexualised in her Officer skin (also in her classic skin why does she need boob-armour? like completely unnecessary)
You will notice that only the more recent female champs ({{champion:429}} , {{champion:421}} and arguably {{champion:203}} ) lack the hyper sexualisation of their predecessors. Also, considering the 80 female champs in the game, the fact that you can only call to mind 9 that aren't sexualised is a pretty strong indictment on the diversity of the characters.
: >All the female champs were hypersexualized >Ignoring {{champion:89}},{{champion:1}},{{champion:429}}, {{champion:203}},{{champion:113}},{{champion:133}},{{champion:61}},{{champion:421}} and {{champion:254}}, not to mention all the muscled, shirtless, sexualized MALE champs. You should {{summoner:12}} back to tumblr. You won't be missed.
{{champion:89}} is unnecessarily sexualised in her Valkyrie skin (also in her classic skin she has boob armour which is inaccurate and unncessary), {{champion:1}} is a child, so it would be pretty messed up if she were sexualised, {{champion:429}} was one of the more refreshing and interesting designs because she wasn't sexualised, {{champion:203}} isn't a female champ but a dual-gendered spirit thing, {{champion:113}} isn't sexualised, you're right, which makes for a refershing change, {{champion:133}} is sexualised in her Woad Scout skin (SHE IS IN THE FRELJORD: WHY IS SHE WEARING A CROP TOP?), {{champion:61}} is not sexualised either, quite right, {{champion:421}} also makes for a refreshing change and {{champion:254}} is sexualised in her Officer skin (also in her classic skin why does she need boob-armour? like completely unnecessary)
: Champion Insights: Illaoi
> This isn’t a commonly known fact, but a huge chunk of League’s female characters actually share an identical (or near identical) face and body, and are only differentiated by their hair and clothing. No, no, we all knew that all the female champs were hypersexualised and more or less the same design even though all the male champs had a really diverse set of features and body types.

Avatar Kurroto

Level 30 (OCE)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion