: So you dont lose trrack of him, the maker of this thread is Whitepumah. He's just name changed
OHHHHHH lol, that's fucking amazing XD
: Then run it on Low Spec mode...
I mean... riot has issues with the client AND issues in game (Everyone getting FPS drops in random games) and you want to assume that running the client in low spec mode will do something?
: Example of Riot's algorithm to the MMR system
I mean no, Riot bases MMR off the ELO system, which only calculates wins and losses. Players "doing poorly" doesn't mean shit.
Dagina (OCE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Azirious Mistake,realm=OCE,application-id=Ntey9fRZ,discussion-id=y5b70Ahz,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2017-11-17T01:47:38.608+0000) > > no wonder people are toxic lmao. Practically no reward for being sports man like after all lol
I mean, i'm pretty sure honor capsules =/= being sportsmanlike, it's just playing often enough without getting reported.
: Angry, oh boy... Am not angry. I just think your statement is very silly/stupid. All in all, your banned is probly justify. cya in 14days !
Either way, it doesn't give you permission to keep being a dick, think what you want, you don't need to start a fight on the boards about it. Justified or not, it's not for us to decide.
Caelestia (OCE)
: Let's Save Twitch
>By "threatening" to potentially revoke some competitive streams and move to youtube for example Oh yeah lets move to youtube who can't even work their own shit. Who cares honestly, if you get banned on twitch, you could easily just move over to youtube yourself.
Orezon (OCE)
: Clarification and getting turned on and suddenly off
I don't recall anything saying you'd get gemstones or stuff from leveling up. Also "Milestones" are every 10 levels to my knowledge.
: even in blind/draft people do it and there is no punishment for it
Blind doesn't get this feature, as there isn't preset picks, but they are supposed to do it for draft games, as your roles are pre-determined on Riot's side. That said, a lot of the drafts that WOULD have someone doing stuff like that, end up getting dodged.
Nightjar (OCE)
: alternatively, give players like 100BE for playing 5 games a day (win or lose), similar to first win of the day, but encouraging players to put more time in, and try to grind more than just going for first win of the day and logging out.
I mean while i agree with the idea, Riot wouldn't, fact is you can tell from their systems that they are only trying to appeal to the casuals, they won't do anything that would then be worth it for the non-casuals.
Fitzky (OCE)
: What the hell Riot Games?
Yeah i noticed that as well, and it feels completely out of character from the game, especially since the swear filter is now automatically on.
00shots00 (OCE)
: dear rioters can you please explain why im banned for calling someone toxic
I'm going to use my powers of deduction, and assume you instead said "i don't want to kys" And instead got banned due to using a no-no word. If this is legitmately what happened, send a support ticket in, and they will likely unban you. https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/requests/new
JayQue (OCE)
: I had this for a while, client repair fixed for me, but could just be I was lucky joining my next game
You just need to relog, you didn't need to client repair.
Driggz (OCE)
: I played on a mid range laptop prior with no hassles. Mind you, you have to be willing to reduce the fidelity and frame rate slightly. Also my wife plays on a Macbook Pro which works great (except for the recent OS X update).
It's not every game, it seems to be games with lots of particle effects. I run the game on the lowest settings with a brand new decent laptop and get huge FPS drops (to ~15 or lower) to the point where the game is basically un-runnable. And even a player like Imaqtpie has experienced the same Frame drops.
: my 5 year old laptop can run LoL fine. Im sure as long as you dont buy a potato you can play LoL. You can get a shitty laptop for like $400 that will play LoL but I would recommend spending atleast $600-700. Before going shopping you should look at the recommended specs though just in case: https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/201752654-Minimum-and-Recommended-System-Requirements
I mean, i wouldn't recommend playing league on anything but a high end rig atm, even professional players with high end rigs are having huge FPS drops.
: 1. We get 5 default pages, which eliminates the need of making an "autofill" page. Even if they aren't editable and may not necessarily be 100% correct for that champion, it's better than having AP Quints on Draven. 2. You can edit Runes in Champ Select. It literally only takes 10-15 seconds to edit a page you already have.
>We get 5 default pages, which eliminates the need of making an "autofill" page. Even if they aren't editable and may not necessarily be 100% correct for that champion, it's better than having AP Quints on Draven. 5 default pages, which are ALL terrible. >You can edit Runes in Champ Select. It literally only takes 10-15 seconds to edit a page you already have. Assuming you don't have the runes bug out on you. Fact is 1 page per champion is now a requirement, not 1 page for AP, 1 for AD
Wean (OCE)
: I don't think there is a need to make rune pages free, although it would be much better to earn blue essence more easier. I do wish that Riot have a 'Buy two rune pages at the price of one' offer at some stage every year, so that it makes things a bit easier.
But if they do that, they don't get as much money.
Talon12 (OCE)
: you forgot the ultra rare option that happens more frequently than it should of simply x2 450 shards, probs designed just to piss people off. And 1-30 progression isnt that great either, here is a progression list from levels 1 - 10 1. Access to tutorial, battle training and AI games + Auto Assigned Runes Reforged + Unique free to play champs + BE Shop 2. Ashe 3. Summoners Rift + capsule(Garen shard) 4. Twisted Treeline + Rotating Game mode+Brand 5. Capsule (Caitlyn shard+2880 essence) + Access to Hextech Loot + Exhaust + Barrier 6. Basic Capsule (Xin Zhao shard) + Clarity + Mark + Howling Abyss + Itemsets 7. Flash + Teleport + Twisted Treeline + Basic Capsule (810 BE) 8. Rune System Access(Choose Pages used in Champ Select, 4 base pages) + Basic Capsule (Janna Shard) 9. Cleanse+Ignite+Smite + Practice tool + Basic Capsule (810 Blue Essence) 10. Normals Draftpick + Rotating Game Mode + Glorious Champion Capsule(Kayle shard, Sanguine Garen shard, salughter fleet ward shard and 500 orange essence) +Access to normal free rotation Pretty boring in general, but i think the catcher is they don't even get first win of the day missions any more, and isn't the champs given supposed to be **simple **and **easy **to play? why are they getting brand at lv 4 and caitlyn 5. And hell, I mean those shards, they aren't even provided the damn blue essence to even unlock them all, by level 10 most people were able to afford between 10-16 new champs, in the new system they get not even a handful.
>you forgot the ultra rare option that happens more frequently than it should of simply x2 450 shards, probs designed just to piss people off. If you get this, you are supposed to go contact support. >by level 10 most people were able to afford between 10-16 new champs, in the new system they get not even a handful. But they have to try and get money somehow.
: Why am I not receiving BE?
This is normal, you no longer recieve any currency per game played, instead it's all bundled into a level up package that is underwhelming, designed to be one of 4 options. 3X 450, 2X 1350 shards 1X 1350, 1X 3150 shards 4800 Shard 6300 Shard With an expected heavy weighting to the lower end, and you can only get the BE from disenchanting said shards that you receive from the new system.
: I see... So far I've just been getting lots of Garen/Annie/Yi. I'll see how it goes the next time I level up then.
>Garen/Annie/Yi Funny thing is, i'm pretty sure that new accounts unlock all of these by forced level up rewards, at the very least, they get Garen.
: I kind of just ignore now, but that wasn't my point. I'm saying that while it may be a little harsh sometimes, it's still better than absolutely nothing. Half of the time the people who are being jerks give up and spend more time flaming than actually playing though, so food for thought. That's just the way I see things though. We all would prefer different things for our games, I'm sure, and we all handle different things in different manners, too.
I mean fact is riot should take a stance, either flaming isn't ok and people get banned for it, or flaming is ok, and people can't get banned for it. Right now Riot is trying to do both at the same time, and honestly failing to do anything but piss off their player base.
Montiness (OCE)
: OK, well I've misread the post I quoted saying BE per level up... but I haven't, they just didn't say Champ shards worth X BE.. as someone who doesn't play on other servers, I read it as it read. Find it as unlikely as you want, doesn't change the fact that it happened. My last 2 level ups have contained 900 and 980 worth of shards, so at least it hasn't happened again. Doesn't change the fact that my first levle up was Morg, It also doesn't change that you don't seem to get EXP bonuses for playing as a group, as you used to get for IP, which farther puts this new system behind, and then there's talk for cutting the EXP even further (to 400 for first win of the day) and adding a measly 50 BE to each level up, which as far I can tell further reduces the amount of BE you will get, by up to 1100 per month. So much ft "helping" players get BE faster... But yeah, first two level ups were shithouse, it hasn't continued. Doesn't change the fact that it happened, and after the amount of BS I had with the worlds event rewards, not even bothering lodging a ticket.
Well if you don't want to submit a support ticket, not much can be done then.
: Wait, is that per capsule? As in each capsule from a level up should at least contain 5 shards? Or... Yeah, I don't know.
No it's not 5 shards per capsule, the low rolls are just designed to be multiple low tier champion shards to "make up" for the fact that you got low rolled. 3X 450, 2X 1350 shards 1X 1350, 1X 3150 shards 4800 Shard 6300 Shard. These are the possible drops, if your getting less then these, then you should be sending in a support ticket. And just on a side note, i can tell you that the likelihood of getting the higher sets of shards (the single shard drops), is probably at most around 33%, probably less
Essembie (OCE)
: > [{quoted}](name=lava lord,realm=OCE,application-id=T8eq2lFQ,discussion-id=dcLgREb4,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2017-11-14T08:34:56.738+0000) > > dude its obvious you take things to far pls learn your lesson and accept your punishment ordinarily I'd agree with you but after being on the receiving end of an insta tier 3 for saying "neck yourself" with no steps through the punishment tiers, I am confident that there is something else afoot at the moment because the number of people on the boards mentioning bans is through the roof right now. There are 8 on the front page alone from separate authors. Maybe their algorithm got tweaked? I tell you what though, something is up and it sucks balls.
Maybe Riot is gay, you have no right to judge. Seriously though, they tweaked it so that more phrases are instant escalations, but didn't give anyone any warning for it, so that you all get banned for something that was previously ok, because reasons. Hell i don't understand how anything that isn't basically super racism/homophobia is an instant escalation.
Dagina (OCE)
: Yet another minimum amount capsule. wow.
the second capsule should be 3 90's, and 2 270's, if it wasn't you should contact support, as this is the minimum. And honestly, low rolling is probably a ~50% occurance, and due to maths, has a minimum of ~33% chance of occuring assuming that Riot doesn't use bad luck prevention methods.
: ...I've constantly gotten 1-2 90 BE shards, with maybe two 960s in 8 levels.
Then your getting less then you should, and should probably contact support, since part way through the patch, 3 90's and 2 270's is minimum, and before that it was 2 90's, 2 270's.
: Honestly, I just upvoted it for the Riven main part. But, that aside, the European servers are probably in the same boat. It's not just OCE. And I personally don't really see it as being that big of a problem. Like you said, we just have to continue doing our best to communicate via pings (I'm not even going to include emotes because I'm 100% convinced that's just for fun at this point). Pings do wonders when people actually use them, and there's no need for any chat at all. Don't forget all the people who instantly mute all, too.
>(I'm not even going to include emotes because I'm 100% convinced that's just for fun at this point) Not for fun, for being toxic to other players without chat.
: I suppose that's true, but that's a problem in itself.
Yeah and the problem is consistency, which isn't a good problem to have in a system like this.
: To be fair though, people have been getting away with a lot of shit for a long time. Maybe there are new mods and maybe they are being a bit overzealous, but... I kind of think it's better than having a non-existent punishment system and having people know they can get away with being toxic and salty all the time. Maybe a balance is just in order.
I mean, people still constantly get away with this shit, or else a majority of the league community would be banned.
lava lord (OCE)
: naming and shaming not allowed bro,
That's not naming and shaming, but good try.
: "Riven main" is a Language XD Riot also makes money from this lack of one language >Non-English speaker says something >English speaker rages because they can't understand >Ban >Starts new acc = more money in Rito's pocket
Azury (OCE)
: > [{quoted}](name=lava lord,realm=OCE,application-id=T8eq2lFQ,discussion-id=dcLgREb4,comment-id=0002000000000001000000000000,timestamp=2017-11-14T09:14:32.297+0000) > >[REMOVED] I don't get why you are being so snarky towords me, you have judged me unfairly when I have been nothing but resonable with you.
His been being a bit of an ass on boards atm, don't take it personally, my suggestion is ignore him.
Azury (OCE)
: Why was I Permanently Banned for this text chat?
>Azury: just play bots if you are toxic I mean, toxic players in bots are already an issue, we don't need more assholes in bot games.
Jason (OCE)
: > [{quoted}](name=JasonWazza,realm=OCE,application-id=Ntey9fRZ,discussion-id=ijfE5yaV,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2017-11-14T05:23:34.627+0000) > Also your stat is kinda wrong. > Appears as if I did, oops. The stats I found indicated differently. My bad. > [{quoted}](name=Fitzky,realm=OCE,application-id=Ntey9fRZ,discussion-id=ijfE5yaV,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2017-11-14T05:43:34.469+0000) > > But don't you see that saving the lives of 4 people is better than one? We can only guess what the actual numerical values will be, as we don't have any hard facts on the speaking statistics of the League of Legends playerbase. The idea was bought up to showcase the non-action VS action situation in general, rather than using the numbers as a basis.
>Appears as if I did, oops. The stats I found indicated differently. My bad. Don't worry, your stats just sounded really off (1/5 Australians can't speak english is a ludicrously high number) and i just instantly went and looked for census results that either backed that up, or proved it wrong (1/5 Australians speaking other languages at home makes a lot of sense to me.) Unfortunately, a lot of this comes down to this, if you need to communicate in the game, it's needs to be understandable by the players in the game. Whether that means that Riot works on getting a basic translator into the chat system of the game, or whether it means a language is required to be spoken, either way, if your communicating, it needs to be able to be understood. Because as i have said before, there really is no reason to be speaking anything but English in the game, outside of trying to avoid punishment from insulting other players. (the arguments against this all ended up being flawed, with the most reasonable of the arguments basically falling down to the "just use pings and don't type" argument that means the communication line isn't an issue)
Tele (OCE)
: Hey man, good post! Just a few responses from me to some of the things you mentioned. Lots of good points raised though :) > Stop doing instant 2 week bans off of a No-No word. + I think the system was good before, but I have actually seen more of these recently, so it does seem like something has changed. I'm not sure what the "settings" are now, but I do lean a bit towards your end, there are some cases now where it's a bit harsh. Do keep in mind though that usually the terms that apply to this are quite bad, they're usually homophobic or asking others to commit suicide. If you think it's alright to insult people like that, there really shouldn't be too many second chances. > In bans, highlight the words that have flagged an account, don't just give a chat log. + I think this is a good idea, it's probably good for Riot to specifically point out where you went wrong. Although to be fair, it's usually pretty obvious what you should and shouldn't have said, so I'd never consider this a priority. But I'm sure there are some cases where this would be very helpful. BTW if you're not sure about a why you received a punishment, please post your chat logs on here for us and the rest of the community to look over :D > Stop using reports. + Strongly disagree. Firstly, if you're in a 5-man premade and everyone's in on the jokes, it's not really an issue if you're using "bad language". There's no point in Riot scanning chat logs and banning someone in that case, since there was no harm done to anyone. It only becomes a problem when you're with other people, and not everyone is in on the jokes. That's when you can make the chat/game unenjoyable and offensive. Secondly, the entire Instant Feedback system is based off reports. It learns what kind of behaviour the community finds unacceptable by examining what is reported. If you stopped reports, Instant Feedback wouldn't be able to pick up on any new behaviour, phases or terms, and I think it's important that our detection system keeps up with that IMO. It might sound stupid, but language really does change quickly. A good example is "cuck". As early as 2015 that term was barely used, now it's becoming increasingly common. > Bring back tribunal + Yeap, it's very disappointing for me to see it delayed so long. It's not a replacement for the current system of course, since it's not fast enough to deliver feedback/punishment within 15 minutes. And we [know from psychology](https://www.psychestudy.com/behavioral/learning-memory/operant-conditioning/reinforcement-punishment/delayed-reinforcement) that immediate feedback/punishment is better at changing behaviour than delayed punishment. But a tribunal would be a very welcome addition to the current tools for player behaviour we have now IMO.
>Strongly disagree. >Firstly, if you're in a 5-man premade and everyone's in on the jokes, it's not really an issue if you're using "bad language". There's no point in Riot scanning chat logs and banning someone in that case, since there was no harm done to anyone. It only becomes a problem when you're with other people, and not everyone is in on the jokes. That's when you can make the chat/game unenjoyable and offensive. >Secondly, the entire Instant Feedback system is based off reports. It learns what kind of behaviour the community finds unacceptable by examining what is reported. If you stopped reports, Instant Feedback wouldn't be able to pick up on any new behaviour, phases or terms, and I think it's important that our detection system keeps up with that IMO. >It might sound stupid, but language really does change quickly. A good example is "cuck". As early as 2015 that term was barely used, now it's becoming increasingly common. The issue is, that with Reports being relied on so much, people get away with shit that isn't considered ok. 3/4 man premades can group report people and have them get screwed over. And not only that, if your muting someone at the start of the game, likelihood is your not reporting them, even if they were doing report worthy things while muted. Consistency needs to be key in shit like this, and sadly, i don't think it matters if "everyone is in on the jokes" when, if your wanting to joke like that, go to discord and do it there. also cases of bad language shouldn't be picked up anyway, this is more refering to the higher tiers of issues which people seem to get away with on a regular basis, and would give the bot a more consistent showing of bad behaviour, and give more logs to the player when they are inevitably banned. >Do keep in mind though that usually the terms that apply to this are quite bad, they're usually homophobic or asking others to commit suicide. If you think it's alright to insult people like that, there really shouldn't be too many second chances. Thing is, i'd be fine with the system.... IF the bot could determine context, but it can't and therefore shouldn't be given free reign on this shit. Context is key in all of this shit, and lets face it, this is an algorithm, it can't determine context, and shouldn't be allowed to give instant escalations when it's not reliably able to tell the intent of someone saying things. The ARAM example has already come up on boards where telling someone to kill themselves, is actual strategy, but the same actually applies to fucking SR as well, because sometimes the tank legitimately just needs to kill themselves, so that you can win a teamfight. Unfortunately, kys is actually a fucking broad statement, that can't be determined as bad without proper context. If things like Kill yourself etc. weren't in the system, it'd probably be fine, mind you, i've seen the bot also actively ignore racism and not ban people, so it's a matter of the bot doesn't work like it should. >I think this is a good idea, it's probably good for Riot to specifically point out where you went wrong. Although to be fair, it's usually pretty obvious what you should and shouldn't have said, so I'd never consider this a priority. But I'm sure there are some cases where this would be very helpful. I mean it gives the player the ability to see if the context in question called for what was said, and whether they should go and contact support instantly over it. >Yeap, it's very disappointing for me to see it delayed so long. >It's not a replacement for the current system of course, since it's not fast enough to deliver feedback/punishment within 15 minutes. And we know from psychology that immediate feedback/punishment is better at changing behaviour than delayed punishment. >But a tribunal would be a very welcome addition to the current tools for player behaviour we have now IMO. It's not delayed, to my knowledge it's not coming back, and sure we can argue "feedback and punishment within 15 minutes" but that only applies when the punishment isn't late, like it generally is right now. A lot of the WORST cases we see on the boards, are from people with YEARS to their account, and that just isn't good enough when it's clear that the showing on boards IS their attitude, i've seen plenty of people who think Racism etc. is basically ok, because they don't get banned because of it, and it shows that the system just isn't good enough. The current system is something that i would equate to Youtube's Content ID system, it's a system that is fucked, and only works for the big companies involved, and there is only one big company involved here, and it's definitely not working for the players, because this community sucks ass.
Fux (OCE)
: why was i banned?
It means the ban was done manually by a rioter, for some reason, they don't send emails in that case (Reasons™) Go to Rito support and submit a ticket to find out. https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/requests/new
Jonius7 (OCE)
: Some decent points, I'd like to add some perspectives here. A) No idea if the instant word bans are actually like this (instant 2 weeks), but yeah that would be pretty dumb. Perhaps a clear message to the player on what behavior they shouldn't be doing in the game client could go a long way. B) I think Riot's reasoning for showing chat logs and not highlighting words is "we don't want to reveal which specific words flagged our ban system, because then people would learn how the system works and exploit ways to get around it". Which well, might inevitably happen, but how many people would actually do that compared to the number of people who are just spouting toxic words anyway? C) I think reports are in addition to the automated triggering system. At least they should be. If they're not then that's a case of miscommunication issues by Rioters in the past that players only get flagged to review their chat log only when they get a report/s. D) misspelled words in the database could help, though it could produce some false positives, and maybe it'd require a manual check. But yes, it would help distill that notion that the "word flagging algorithms" are actually more sophisticated than they seem to be. E) can't remember exactly but the reasoning around why Tribunal was closed was something like the users were using the system how they liked, not necessarily using it in the correct way to actually punish those who did wrong. In other words, eg: people might choose to ban someone because they found the chat log funny, not because it was a toxic example that deserved punishment. Perhaps a compromise is a selective tribunal, where assorted cases are selected for community feedback whether that player should be punished or not, and these cases would be manually reviewed, while the others would still go through much of the automated process. That way, the community can feel like they are involved, but then again this may not be very clear so it may still cause miscommunication issues? F) Not sure what the argument is here (name and shame not allowed on forums, but it should be allowed in game...?) I guess the idea is to make it clearer on whether that report on "Player A" the other day actually did anything? We get the messages like "A player you reported had been punished" but we don't know who what when which game, and across multiple games and players; the notification seems to only go to the most recent report while the ones leading up to catching the punished player don't really get credited. But overall, yes increased transparency and communication as to how the ban and reporting system actually works would help ease the frustration for players. It does come with the risk of making the system too open and exploitable though.
>A) No idea if the instant word bans are actually like this (instant 2 weeks), but yeah that would be pretty dumb. Perhaps a clear message to the player on what behavior they shouldn't be doing in the game client could go a long way. It is, a lot of players are coming in here with 0 history of bans, and being banned off of simple phrases, and it's gotten to the point where it's just pathetic. >B) I think Riot's reasoning for showing chat logs and not highlighting words is "we don't want to reveal which specific words flagged our ban system, because then people would learn how the system works and exploit ways to get around it". Which well, might inevitably happen, but how many people would actually do that compared to the number of people who are just spouting toxic words anyway? I mean, while they don't want to reveal which words are flagging their ban system, fact is that people already know, it's why no one uses kys unless they are an unaware person. Proper toxic players avoid all the flagged words. >C) I think reports are in addition to the automated triggering system. At least they should be. If they're not then that's a case of miscommunication issues by Rioters in the past that players only get flagged to review their chat log only when they get a report/s. Nope, no report, no flagging, you get away with all the chat you said in that game. >E) can't remember exactly but the reasoning around why Tribunal was closed was something like the users were using the system how they liked, not necessarily using it in the correct way to actually punish those who did wrong I mean i recall something similar said, but fact is "using the system how they liked" is kinda the fucking idea, we decide what is toxic and what isn't, that is using the system how we like. >In other words, eg: people might choose to ban someone because they found the chat log funny, not because it was a toxic example that deserved punishment. I think you'd find it was kinda the opposite, if a chat log was funny banter, it would be usually given a lot more leniency, and a decent amount of the people were actually found not guilty with the tribunal instead of the current bot's idea of "guilty until proven innocent to rito support 3-5 days from now."
Jason (OCE)
: Communication VS Multiculturalism - Why our "English speaking server" isn't that simple...
>There's an ethical and moral dilemma known as the "Trolley Problem", where two train tracks exist, four people tied to one, and one person tied to the other. You can save the lives of 4 people by swapping tracks, but then you'd be directly responsible for one person's death. Riot finds themselves in a similar situation, but instead of Death, they face potential community backlash. You realise that in that problem, the general outcome is that a lot of people change the track? I think the main version of the problem that was one that people decided not to act, was when you were supposed to "push a large person in front of the trolley to stop it" and that was because you physically are doing the action. Either way, we aren't talking about murder, and it's kinda hyperbolic to use this as the argument. Also your stat is kinda wrong. >In 2016, there were over 300 separately identified languages spoken in Australian homes. More than one-fifth (21 per cent) of Australians spoke a language other than English at home. After English, the next most common languages spoken at home were Mandarin, Arabic, Cantonese, and Vietnamese. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/lookup/Media%20Release3 This isn't saying that they DON'T speak english, this is saying they speak a language other then English in their own homes.
QAPLA (OCE)
: The JasonWazza crusade continues. I swear, half these forum threads are started by you lately. xD I'm not saying you're wrong, the system is fucked. I agree. Someone could say "you're a %%%" (using 4 instead of a), and a reply of "I'm not a %%%" flags the chat bots. Someone in an ARAM game says, "I have so much gold, I need to die". A reply of "kys" gets you a ban. In that context it's entirely game related and in an effort to win. Now I know the rules, and I behave. I had an account permabanned on NA back in season 2 (before OCE existed), and I've been good ever since. What I really want is an in-game translator, so if I'm playing with Asians, I know if they're being abusive or whatever. I get the whole issue with languages, and don't side on the 'English only' on OCE server, but the language ban bots should include foreign languages. If some Chinese/Korean/whatever guy is being abusive (and I don't understand what he/she is saying), they deserve bans no less than someone saying the same thing in English. If I go learn Swahili, and abuse people in a language no one knows, I get away scot free. As it is now, abuse in English gets you banned, abuse in foreign language doesn't. Sort it out.
Actually since i just got one of THOSE games, had a player be completely racist, referencing jews in a bad light and such, multiple racist comments early etc. I got no notification of him being banned after that game, and it's considered ok, and this was all in english. Real toxicity doesn't get bans, only shitty 1 no-no word usages get bans. EDIT: and i'm fairly sure he actually used a no-no word, the one that is close to nugget for the first half of the word.
QAPLA (OCE)
: Hextech Crafting Question
It starts January 16 https://na.leagueoflegends.com/en/page/2017-ranked-season-ends-november-7
  Rioter Comments
Essembie (OCE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Talon12,realm=OCE,application-id=T8eq2lFQ,discussion-id=xKQmEM5r,comment-id=00010002,timestamp=2017-11-13T02:37:33.132+0000) > > I got a punishment for a game where literally the only thing i said was "Fuck off and dc ekko, then go tie a bloody knot" because he was inting in a ranked game for no reason, and i had him 3 times in a row, was sick to death of it. and I bet the ekko got off scott free.
QAPLA (OCE)
: The JasonWazza crusade continues. I swear, half these forum threads are started by you lately. xD I'm not saying you're wrong, the system is fucked. I agree. Someone could say "you're a %%%" (using 4 instead of a), and a reply of "I'm not a %%%" flags the chat bots. Someone in an ARAM game says, "I have so much gold, I need to die". A reply of "kys" gets you a ban. In that context it's entirely game related and in an effort to win. Now I know the rules, and I behave. I had an account permabanned on NA back in season 2 (before OCE existed), and I've been good ever since. What I really want is an in-game translator, so if I'm playing with Asians, I know if they're being abusive or whatever. I get the whole issue with languages, and don't side on the 'English only' on OCE server, but the language ban bots should include foreign languages. If some Chinese/Korean/whatever guy is being abusive (and I don't understand what he/she is saying), they deserve bans no less than someone saying the same thing in English. If I go learn Swahili, and abuse people in a language no one knows, I get away scot free. As it is now, abuse in English gets you banned, abuse in foreign language doesn't. Sort it out.
>The JasonWazza crusade continues. >I swear, half these forum threads are started by you lately. xD Yeah they probably do, but fact is, i'm tired of getting into games with abusive people, and seeing them get away scot free with it. And it's not like it's the odd game, it's basically every game.
Rioter Comments
: > [{quoted}](name=JasonWazza,realm=OCE,application-id=FjGAIbRv,discussion-id=KYg9EUxh,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2017-10-29T10:44:18.774+0000) > > Match Making Rating (MMR) isn't affected by anything except wins and losses. > > You win, and your hidden score goes up, lose and it goes down. MMR base of wins and losing. LOL MMR is based on a lot of things.. Wards / Damage amount / Deaths / Kills / CSing and champion you play and so on. Not just win or lose. That is so failed in it's self it isn't funny. Lets say for a second you are playing very easy champion to play. Lets say Teemo. You did the most damage and died the least. But what you didn't do is buy wards / CS very well and you have less then 20% KP and also your APM was about 40. When team fights happen you were off cuddling the dragon and whispering in it's ear. All this can have effect on your MMR. Don't worry about win or lose. Just worry about how well you were CSing , Warding, Damage taken, Damage dealt and so on. MMR is based on you. Not the team.
I mean, your just wrong, simple as that.
LAKIGR (OCE)
: > [{quoted}](name=Lebron Games,realm=OCE,application-id=T8eq2lFQ,discussion-id=xKQmEM5r,comment-id=000100000000,timestamp=2017-11-12T04:35:16.994+0000) > > yeah alright lets ignore hundreds and potentially thousands of other instances of "good behaviour" and lets focus aggressively on the 1 instance of "bad behaviour" and permanently ban the person. i mean, that mentality is the definition of negative and toxic. suspension/bans when it comes to chat "offenses" should be for consistent offenses. That’s like me say robbing a bank getting caught and say but iv followed the law for the last 20 years why are u punishing me. Doing good behaviour doesn’t make u exempt from when u do bad behaviour
I mean no, people keep saying it like that, but that's not how it works. The hyperbole defence is just terrible. Especially when Riot themselves have said they try and target the actual "toxic" players and not the "neutral" players years back, when it's clear that's not what they do.
Nightjar (OCE)
: I think it's more accurate to say assassin metas are only exciting for assassins. For instance counterjungling and being counterjungled and trying to setup vision for a surprise assassination or ambush for a counter gank is exceptionally fun for assassin players, playing around with bushes and try to out juke your opponent or escape and then predict where you can circle round and get revenge is very entertaining. Being oneshot isn't especially fun, but it becomes alot more exciting when both players can 1shot the other, and so it becomes a game of patience and reaction speed, and a shaco and khazix playing a game of hide and seek in the jungle is alot more exciting and interactive than being malzahar ulted. On the other hand in say the assassin vs adc matchup, it's still kind of fun for the assassin, trying to find a way to sneak in, burst the adc and leg it before their team notices, but for the adc it's not especially interactive since alot of the peel and defense they have is focused on the support and tanks, and not being ambushed relies alot on the team setting up proper vision control. Still this is how the matchup is supposed to be, and it would be like complaining that knights are too good at forking and slipping through defensive pawn formations in chess. Assassins have strengths and weaknesses, and since they offer nothing to a traditional teamcomp, their role is to assassinate the backline and pick off enemies out of position.
Well i mean, they are only fun for an ahead assassin, put 2 assassin's against each other, and watch the one behind hate being an assassin, because they can't even 1-shot the ADC.
: Hey Riot, how do slip ups like Galio make it to live?
Because PBE isn't for testing the balance, it's for "bug testing" even though a decent amount of bugs still make it to live, they manage to iron out a lot of the major ones. And the balancing team is a bunch of people who don't understand the game or balancing, as was proven by what they said about Galio in that he was expected to build some AP and some tank, they show a massive misunderstanding in what happens in league of legends. Not only that, but a calculator could have told you that the ratios were going to be really high and abused, but Rito is too poor to give their balancing team calculators.
Zeffa (OCE)
: Kicked out of own club
https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/requests/new Submit a support ticket.
: Can't believe I found someone this toxic low level...
Just so we are clear, report them, and copy this text into the report field, or submit a support ticket; https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/requests/new Another thing is that is seems that when someone misspells something like "c unt" it doesn't get picked up by the Automated bot, as i believe that is one of the words on the list, but had someone spell it wrong in my game and not get banned off it.
slxw (OCE)
: neither did I. um, yes you can afk, and you know what will happen, {{item:3302}}
I mean, if you look at any of the int feeder accounts, it takes upwards of 100's of games for them to actually be stopped. The argument is basically "it could just be a bad day for them" when really that argument doesn't fly with the technology riot has that can detect where deaths were.... but why would we try and prevent intent feeding?
Show more

JasonWazza

Level 35 (OCE)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion