WoIf (OCE)
: [Patch V9.14] - TFT - Weekly Mission Bug
You can click the little picture of the bug in the bottom right-hand corner of the client: https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/115005466327-Report-a-Bug Or you can head over to the report a bug section of boards on NA (_read the rules for posting and the sub-board guidelines before posting_): https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/bug-report
Zyloxian (NA)
: > [{quoted}](name=Seras Dragon,realm=OCE,application-id=Ntey9fRZ,discussion-id=McALKW7v,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-07-17T06:28:56.262+0000) > > As much as people hate to talk about money, because in an already completely free to play game there has to be limits on the extra content people can get for free or the business model falls apart and everyone loses. What business model? You mean the model where you spend all your time on tft instead of fixing server issues? And you ban people for using a particular word that hurts your feelings instead of banning the people that play like absolute trash? You have no business model.
1. I'm pretty sure the team that designed and is balancing TFT is not the same (though it may overlap somewhat) as the teams that work on SR. 2. What server issues? If it's an NA thing, this isn't NA. 3. Why can't we ban abuse in chat *and* intentional feeders/trolls/griefers/etc? Since they're both breaking the rules and both negatively impacting other people should they *both* not face consequences? 4. I'm not a Rioter and don't run my own business, so you are correct I don't have a business model.
: > [{quoted}](name=Seras Dragon,realm=OCE,application-id=FjGAIbRv,discussion-id=NbmOY6qH,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2019-07-17T06:41:29.480+0000) > > Not sure about the Brand ult, but both the pathing bugs and the Frozen Heart bugs were explicitly mentioned in the TFT patch notes as being fixed (at least in the test environment). aw okay, ty, found even more bugs now though, load screen's freezing and making me restart 3-5 times until I quit on ranked TFT from a 10min 5% freeze screen
Well it is still a beta, though issues like that could well be client related rather than mode related. Only way to know though is to replicate it in other modes.
: you dont get chat restrictions for telling people to kill themslves its a guaranteed 14day ban riot says that all the time but again i dont see a 14day break in their match history
See all the above points. If the system missed something and it's being manually reviewed it's not going to be a fast process. Maybe there was something else in that history, maybe you had someone muted and missed some context, maybe it just hasn't reached the front of the line for manual review yet. I don't know the whole story and neither do you, that is entirely my point.
: That doesn't stop players seeing that they are still playing via OP.GG and similar sites, and knowing that riot support did nothing.
A player not receiving a ban doesn't mean nothing was done. OP.GG doesn't show chat restrictions for example. Nor does any one player have the full story of another player's history and account status. Manual reports are also slow.
ZefLyf (OCE)
: Cursing is not a crime anywhere that isn't a totalitarian shit hole (Riot HQ?), so yes, they should be let out of jail, but not for the half baked reason you suggest. "So we should let rich people out of prison because they are rich?" Maybe you shouldn't use a strawman in lieu of real understanding. I know mods are usually the personality type to add their 2 cents to everything despite having an empty wallet, but do try to resist that urge for our sake.
It was an analogy, I'm sure you got the point. It's also worth considering that some things like threats *are* in fact a crime. Riot has the right to moderate the game the way they see fit since it's their game and all. Being a business they are going to moderate the game in a way that makes the majority happy since it makes that majority more likely to spend money and/or spread the game and introduce new people. They are also going to moderate to their M rating. As players, we agree to follow a code of conduct in order to play the game. Fail to do so and you lose the right to play the game, except Riot is lenient enough to put the consequence on the account rather than the player unless there is actual criminal activity involved. Also, you don't get punished just for cursing.
Flight (OCE)
: I accidentally submitted the wrong dimension ( it was 7px off for length) and I couldn't edit my submission so I re-submitted with a new upload. Is that okay? I know multiple entries aren't allowed but I couldn't edit my earlier entry :(
Resubmits are fine so long as they come in before entries close :)
: > [{quoted}](name=Seras Dragon,realm=OCE,application-id=ElA0rvVL,discussion-id=b99QxH5b,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2019-07-17T06:05:40.646+0000) > > "Expiring" would indicate that it has not yet expired, but will soon. If you remember which game got you promoted to D4, then count 10 games from there and that's how many games you are protected for. thats strange, becoz i have played alot more than 10 games., so it should have expired already. ive searched up some forums and it seems this message comes when you have lost too many games at 0 lp, and have very low MMR and therefore risk demotion to the next tier. Could you verify this? I have had a bad llose streak and have lost 6 games in a row at 0 lp, so I'm really scared of getting demoted to platinum, because i want to keep diamond rewards :((
It could be that it's 10 games at 0 LP? That sounds like too much but I'm not sure sorry. Player Support might be able to shed some more light but the only info I have is what's in that FAQ that I linked. https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/requests/new
WiFilter (OCE)
: hardware ban is the most effective just like overwatch or apex
Still hits places like internet cafes, which a substantial number of players play from. There is no perfect solution.
: done that riots reply "bla bla bla copy pasted message we will investigate it bla bla" never actually investigats it with clear proof in a picture or small clip player goes unbanned
You get the macro response because there is *no* information player support can give you about another person's account. They cannot even imply anything.
Mirrow (OCE)
: Are we able to trade in tokens from Arcade to PROJECT or will I have to get the 100 prestige points and hope it's a skin that I like? I think that Irelia skin does look quite nice but I'm hoping that the prestige points would unlock something better later on in the year.
Tokens are specific to the event they are earned in, so you'll have to go the prestige points route if that's what you want. I believe prestige points expire at the end of each year so, not sure if that changes things for you.
: Cheers, but if your busy atm i probbaly wont be unbaned util maybe aday before anyways XD ty tho and good luck
Yes but if it's a false punishment then you don't want it to affect things like your honour and your history going forward.
: Me and the boys
Have you considered that the skins team (artists) and the champions team (the people responsible for balance) are entirely separate? As for some champs not getting any recent skins, old mate Wilk said it better than I could: > The reason that champs like Lux, Ezreal, and Ahri receive skins more often is not because of Riot's favoritism, but rather the player base's. https://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/story-art/s7fGzxqr-popular-champions-getting-skins-they-arent-riots-favorites
ZefLyf (OCE)
: "you already got the enjoyment for the money u spent" That sure is a funny way to look at what is advertised as a permanent unlock.
So we should let rich people out of prison because they are rich? Everyone is held to the same standard of behaviour regardless of how much money they have or are likely to spend on the game, because how much disposable income you have has absolutely no impact on your behaviour or how that behaviour affects others. With the exceptions of behaviours like cheating, you will always receive a warning before a permanent suspension. At that point, it's the player's choice to heed it or not.
: > [{quoted}](name=Exarch Leona,realm=OCE,application-id=FjGAIbRv,discussion-id=NbmOY6qH,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-06-20T04:14:43.029+0000) > > Holy crap, so im not the only one whos noticed. > Hell, theres been times ive had champs right next to each other too and it hasn't bounced. yeah or the pathing in TFT pausing when there's a gap they can clearly walk onto or frozen heart not working in it if you place the wielder far from the champs in the first or second row of tiles
Not sure about the Brand ult, but both the pathing bugs and the Frozen Heart bugs were explicitly mentioned in the TFT patch notes as being fixed (at least in the test environment).
: majority of people that tell me to kill myself dont get banned even if i report them i check back days and weeks after and they dont have a 14day break in their match history.
If you feel such behaviour is being missed or overlooked by the system then I would encourage you to submit a ticket to player support with those reports. That kind of language is taken very seriously and has no place in this game or anywhere else. Naturally, support won't be able to give you any information about another players account, but you can at least ensure it's receiving the review that it should.
: Hey i got wrongly temp baned can someone check to clarify?
The part of the system that handles gameplay offences (intent feeding falls under that umbrella) is typically more cautious in its actions. As a result, gameplay punishments are typically slower than chat ones, but the false positive rate is tiny. That's not to say it's impossible, but without watching the replays I'm not going to say anything with any degree of certainty as match history alone can often be misleading. If you feel you were unduly punished, I'd recommend you submit a ticket to player support to appeal the restriction: https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/requests/new There is a high volume of tickets at the moment, so you'll have to be a bit patient.
: Chest cap
As much as people hate to talk about money, because in an already completely free to play game there has to be limits on the extra content people can get for free or the business model falls apart and everyone loses.
: Has it already expired? If i lose now, will i get demoted to plat 1? It says it is expiring so will i be allowed to lose a few more games before demoting? Thanks.
"Expiring" would indicate that it has not yet expired, but will soon. If you remember which game got you promoted to D4, then count 10 games from there and that's how many games you are protected for.
: Need help fixing my client pls.
Tech isn't my area, but the [Hextech Repair Tool](https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/224826367-Automated-Troubleshooting-Hextech-Repair-Tool) may be able to find and clear out any old files causing problems. Failing that, I'd recommend submitting a ticket to Player Support as they are much more familiar with the myriad of things that can go wrong. There appears to be a high volume of tickets at the moment so please be patient when waiting for a response. https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/requests/new
: DEMOTION SHIELD EXPIRING
Means if you lose at 0LP you no longer have demotion protection. >After being promoted into a new division or tier, you’ll gain the effects of a demotion ‘shield,’ which prevents you from dropping. This is to keep you from winning a series, losing a few games and then immediately dropping back to where you were. The shield lasts for 3 games after advancing a division, and 10 games after advancing a tier (3 games for Master tier). https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/204010760-Ranked-Play-FAQ#h3q2
: What is going on?
There is a high volume of tickets at the moment so support is a bit slower than usual. You didn't really give any idea of a timeframe, but submitting more tickets for the same issue before receiving a response just bumps you back to the bottom of the queue. If this was the case and you've been sending multiple tickets in close succession, then just stop that and wait a couple of days and you should get a response. If you at some point got a response to the effect of "you have been transferred to the player behaviour team", they are a much smaller team (but more specialised and able to handle certain cases) so just be patient. Most likely you will be directed through the account recovery process to verify ownership, secure and then restore the account.
Hot Pope (OCE)
: How are players like this not IP banned?
Because IP bans are basically ineffective in the age of dynamic IPs and are more likely to deny an entire university or net cafe the game than denying any single player. That said, threats are taken very seriously, and assuming you didn't make it to post-game to report I'd recommend submitting the screenshot (removed from this post under the name and shame rules) to player support: https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/requests/new They won't be able to give you any information about any actions taken, since the status and any information regarding another player's account is private and not something support can share, but submitting a ticket ensures a manual review. To be clear, post-game reporting is always best to use where possible, as manual reviews are much slower and don't inform the IFS so it can make faster and more accurate decisions in future.
Corgee (OCE)
: riot?
If you received a punishment it was for your behaviour, not the behaviour of others. You being punished, doesn't in any way mean no-one else can be, and utilising post-game reporting is very important. If you want a community review, you'll have to post the chat logs, since there isn't really much anyone can say without knowing why you were actually punished.
Excited (OCE)
: You're points are valid and with merit, However you missed quite a few other points which also deserve attention. There are more types of smurfs than just those who create alt accounts and go in bronze, to assume its just the lowest of ranks is arrogant presumption. 1. **Account sharing**: Regular account which 80% of the time is used normally with occasionally being used by a friend or family member. They owned the desired champ the "smurf" wishes to play, so they use the account for practice. 2. **Mate boosting**: Mate plays like a god in norms, other mates figure "he deserves to not be in iron, bronze or silver etc." so they will either A: Play on the account while also practicing off-roles and champions they normally wouldn't use. B: Duo and just tell their mate to play passive and focus on farm, They will be so nervous they will just do as they are told. 3: **The Sadistic Smurf**: OCE has alot of these! i know because i'm one of them. I'm hard-stuck D3. i'm not getting any higher unless i grind a fuck ton, its taxing and on OCE high elo is inbred. if you piss anyone off the chances of them being in the next game are quite high. i don't like playing norms because its not that fun for me, so i'll jump on a "Alt" account. it can range from g4 to p1. Generally i wont go below g4 because i dont need a montage real and most of those players are chimps. its not even close. 4. **The Montage smurf**: Don't have alot of these because we have very little content creators on OCE and most of the League stuff on youtube has been done over and over. 5. **The Stream Smurf**: MidBeast, perfect example of this, plays smurfs for views on twitch UNRANKED TO CHALLENGER! and will grind. Last thing i want to touch on is the MMR and i'm going to use Midbeast as an example here. on multiple occasions the MMR system has failed to detect he was a smurf, in x2 instances he had a 28 win streak and still climbed like a normal player. never skipped or even vs'ed harder players. Even he has stated that the MMR system on OCE needs attention. Which brings me to your second Smurf Type. 6. **The genuine smurf**: This account is made for the sole purpose of climbing fast in either a new role or a main role with better stats or a tilt account. However, in most circumstances they encounter the hard stuck MMR., they go on massive win streaks, get frustrated because it isnt climbing and drop the account. There are alot of types of smurfs and alot of scenarios that can be played out. but the percentage is smurfs on OCE is quite high, and account sharing has been an issue for some time. TLDR: More than 1 type of smurf, don't just classify them as 2 types when very wrong and misinformation. MMR system for smurfing needs QOL attention
1.. Account sharing isn't typically punished (despite being explicitly against the ToS) unless it's used maliciously or problematically. Two people playing the same account in ranked is recognised as problematic and is a quick and easy way to get your shared account banned. It basically falls under the boosting umbrella and as far as I know follows the same punishment pattern. 2A. This is boosting. Boosting is banned. Both boostee and (where possible) booster get a 14-day ban with loss of all current and previous ranked rewards, perma for repeat offenders. As far as I know, these are typically done in waves so sometimes they can take a bit longer than would be ideal but more are caught overall. 2B. Duo boosting is a bit trickier. There can be a substantial skill disparity even in the allowed tier differences, and duo 'boosting' in this manner is obviously fine. Ultimately, everyone has that opportunity so it's not an unfair advantage, just one that some people don't take..well advantage of. Where it's a high-level player levelling a new account to play with a lower-tier friend that gets dicey and basically fits into all the points in my original comment. Where do we draw the line and how should that line be managed? 3.. + 4. See 1 in my original comment. Intent, where's the line, are they causing problems etc etc. 5.. The people that just lose placements I don't think face all that much consequence (which personally I disagree with, but probably it's not enough time for the system to determine intent), but they also are very quickly adjusted to the games they should be in by the system. Like I said, generally inside of 10 games. Not skipping tiers doesn't necessarily mean it's not accurately reading his MMR. Don't look at his tier, look at the games and the relative MMR of the people he's playing with/against. Skipping tiers comes down to how confident the system is in a more exact visible rank to match the MMR it's seeing. The MMR is generally still putting people in the games they should be in reasonably quickly (in my experience). 6.. This is where the misinterpretation of the term I had comes in a bit. (To be clear, I also was under the impression smurf essentially was interchangeable with alt account). By definition, smurf is an explicitly malicious descriptor. Again though, I addressed this in my original comment. TL;DR I was not classifying them as two kinds of smurfs/alts, I said there was two key points when discussing smurfs/alts overall. Possibly it does need some QoL attention, but that doesn't at all mean things are as broken as people portray.
: > [{quoted}](name=Seras Dragon,realm=OCE,application-id=Ntey9fRZ,discussion-id=gEEZ0IXF,comment-id=00000000000000000000,timestamp=2019-07-14T08:25:57.122+0000) > > Zhonya's also give armour though. Zhonya's and maybe a health item is often enough to prevent the one-shots > im not trying to be rude here but i have a legit question. Do you even play the game?
Since TFT came out not near as much, but before that, multiple games a day.
Athenelol (OCE)
: 95% of all games in gold 2 and gold 1 MMR have smurfs. What is Riot doing about it?
There are two key points to address here: 1. The ethics of alternate accounts. 2. The actual status of a given account. 1- Should alternate accounts be banned entirely, or should only smurfing be punished? Where do you draw the line and how do you determine intent? Let's take two Master tier players as an example. Player 1 has created a second account, and purposefully dropped it into Bronze to stomp lower tier players every now and again. This is clearly problematic behaviour on multiple levels and should be (and usually are) punished. Player 2 has created a second account to climb the ranks again, either in an off-role or simply to see how far they can get from a fresh start. For 10 or so games this player is still going to be messing with the true MMR of the games they are in, causing inaccuracies. You could argue such players are having a negative impact as well, but there is no ill intent, and in fact, they have a perfectly legitimate reason for levelling a new account. Should they be denied that long-term opportunity for the short term and temporary negative impact they have? 2- Just because an account has a low level and a high win-rate, doesn't mean it's an alt or a smurf. It could be a veteran from before uncapped levelling making their comeback (you yourself appear to have played for at least 5 seasons and are only level 60). It could be a player with previous MOBA experience making their foray into League (there's more than a few DotA converts). It may be a player with transferrable skills from other genres of game playing League for the first time (other RTS and micro/macro management type deals). It could be a new player who got placed lower than they wanted and has taken the time in research and practice mode or customs to hones their skills before jumping back into ranked. An abnormally high win-rate could just mean it's a player who mostly plays normals and has improved there before try-harding it in ranked. An abnormally high score could be attributed to the polarising nature of gold and below games. An abnormally high KDA but a low win-rate could be attributed to good champion mechanics but average or sub-par macro and game management. The thing is, smurfs really aren't all that common. Those that are blatantly smurfing (think player 1 from the above example) are going to get banned real fast for intent feeding or any number of other offences. If they're being sneaky about it it might take longer, but they either aren't playing many games at all or are playing most games completely normally, which will match their MMR pretty well. The same goes for high tier alt accounts. Even if you ignore the fact that the high tier population isn't all that large comparatively, the system gets the MMR of those accounts accurate (or very close to) inside of 10 games. For example, my (Plat) alt account, on which I play ADC instead of Support was versing high Golds and Low plats before I'd even finished placements. Of course, the other thing is, the starting MMR is low-mid Silver, so players who belong in that range through Gold are going to be seeing more of such accounts than any other bracket. ___ There are so so many factors that go into an account, and someone having a good game or having experience outside of League etc. etc. is just as punishable as someone having a bad game (i.e not at all). Though naturally, if you see genuinely problematic behaviour, you should absolutely report it.
: you're wrong but sure zonyas only delays your death for 2 seconds and mord cant 1v3 unsless hes 6 items agaist 1 item players
Zhonya's also give armour though. Zhonya's and maybe a health item is often enough to prevent the one-shots, which is all an on the ball APC needs to turn around and pop the assassin. If the assassin is stupid fed that's a different story, but you said "any assassin champ", not "a stupid fed assassin". As for Morde, I haven't played all that much since his rework (TFT and all that), but a decent Morde who isn't absurdly underfed and has at least alright positioning isn't going to get one-shot by anyone except maybe a very fed Veigar.
: you're not reading my comment are you lmfao? there is no "my behavior" its other players behavior not mine omegalol my comment is basically saying you can "reform" but it takes effort you're own effort, i still think riots system is shit and i also still like shit talking trolls but not in ways that can get you banned. League is a great game story art skins lore ect balance not so much but holy hell can people be %%%%s sometimes lol
>**i** like to shit talk trash players The keyword being "I". *Your* bans are about *your* behaviour. Someone else doing a bad does not change your actions/reactions, nor does it make your bad behaviour magically ok.
: > [{quoted}](name=Seras Dragon,realm=OCE,application-id=FjGAIbRv,discussion-id=MGYb0THk,comment-id=00010000000000000003000000040000,timestamp=2019-07-01T11:23:59.509+0000) > > After actually looking it up, you are in fact correct. I didn't learn the term from League, and it was colloquial slang to begin with. Certainly, in some games it has become synonymous with alt account, which can definitely be misleading. I shall have to revise my wording in future it seems. so u are just too stupid to understand why are they smurfing or boosting
If misusing a commonly misused term makes me stupid then I guess I can own that. I certainly wouldn't be alone. My point still stands though. Someone playing on an alt account does not necessarily mean they are doing so maliciously, and someone stomping you in lane does not necessarily mean they have an alt that is high rank and/or that they are smurfing.
: How do i remove that mission its triggering me
Unless EUW has different mission cycles it should have disappeared when the week reset. If they do then, whenever your week resets.
Fallion (OCE)
: Does it mean I'll submit it 1350 by 1080 or 150 by 120 (multiplied/divided by 9)?
You can submit in 150 x 120 :) It's the shape that matters not the size.
Ahzoos (OCE)
: This years ultimate rarity skin
The stopped doing them every year after Sona (or was it Lux?). The work and conception that goes into Ultimate skins is massive, and no-one wants to get the rushed ultimate skin for their favourite champion. Since the quality and depth of Ultimate skins went up, Riot basically said "we're going to take the time to do these right, instead of getting as many out as possible." We are getting epic and legendary skins at a much higher frequency (and for the most part quality) than we used to now as well, so really it's wins all around. As cool as ultimate skins are, personally I'd rather the time is spent to make them truly awesome.
: 2019 Dual Art Contest Wave 1 - Arcade!
######**_~~ALERT INCOMING~~_** There seems to be some confusion regarding what classifies as pixel art so let's try to clear things up a bit. **_*~~Pixel Art~~*_** is a **deliberate effect created on a pixel level**. _***~~Pixellation~~***_ is a product of low resolution. Pixel art is always pixellated, but a pixellated image or drawing is not always pixel art. Drawing/painting at a low resolution can be a good start, but it is not inherently pixel art. . ___ ######**_~~EXAMPLES~~_** https://i.imgur.com/OPyXfzi.png?noredirect vs https://i.imgur.com/zVq54DV.png?noredirect A good way to distinguish them if you are unsure is to take a step back. https://i.imgur.com/m9nQGhG.png?noredirect vs https://i.imgur.com/EkTeg6a.png?noredirect Pixel art isn't art painted at a low resolution to make it pixellated, it's art created (or refined) on the pixel level. More pixels (higher resolution) means more work to refine the effect, and pixel art generally follows the "less is more" policy.
: test
>######**_~~ALERT INCOMING~~_** There seems to be some confusion regarding what classifies as pixel art so let's try to clear things up a bit. **_*~~Pixel Art~~*_** is a **deliberate effect created on a pixel level**. _***~~Pixellation~~***_ is a product of low resolution. Pixel art is always pixellated, but a pixellated image or drawing is not always pixel art. Drawing/painting at a low resolution can be a good start, but it is not inherently pixel art. . >######**_~~EXAMPLES~~_** https://i.imgur.com/OPyXfzi.png vs https://i.imgur.com/zVq54DV.png A good way to distinguish them if you are unsure is to take a step back. https://i.imgur.com/m9nQGhG.png vs https://i.imgur.com/EkTeg6a.png Pixel art isn't art painted at a low resolution to make it pixellated, it's art created on the pixel level. More pixels (higher resolution) means more work to refine the effect, and pixel art very much follows the "less is more" policy.
Rioter Comments
: How many Boards posts do you have?
>######**_~~ALERT INCOMING~~_** There seems to be some confusion regarding what classifies as pixel art so let's try to clear things up a bit. **_*~~Pixel Art~~*_** is a **deliberate effect created on a pixel level**. _***~~Pixellation~~***_ is a product of low resolution. Pixel art is always pixellated, but a pixellated image or drawing is not always pixel art. Drawing/painting at a low resolution can be a good start, but it is not inherently pixel art. . >######**_~~EXAMPLES~~_** https://i.imgur.com/OPyXfzi.png?noredirect vs https://i.imgur.com/zVq54DV.png?noredirect A good way to distinguish them if you are unsure is to take a step back. https://i.imgur.com/m9nQGhG.png?noredirect vs https://i.imgur.com/EkTeg6a.png?noredirect Pixel art isn't art painted at a low resolution to make it pixellated, it's art created on the pixel level. More pixels (higher resolution) means more work to refine the effect, and pixel art very much follows the "less is more" policy.
: Riot logos are the exception to the "free to use so long as the content is free to access" clause with regards to Riot IP (i.e you can't use them on your work under any circumstances without the explicit permission and endorsement of Riot themselves). I'm not sure how strictly this applies to the League of Legends logo itself (the Riot one is a definite no-go), it may be possible to allow that so I'll chase it up. So long as it's clearly *not* a Riot logo (and doesn't belong to anyone else either) you could create a spoof of some sort and that would be safe. tl;dr Riot logo absolutely not, LoL logo possibly I'll ask around, but assume no for now.
You can use the League of Legends logo in your piece given the context :)
Canc (OCE)
: I thought I gave up on finishing the piece and just submitted yesterday, then 1 hour later I had some idea and want to push for it to finish. My question is I linked my art, but can I continue to modify my entry on that same link? When is the cut-off you would collate all the entries?
I do believe we left the "edit after submission" option available. If you lost the link, you can also just resubmit your artwork and we will use the latest valid entry (though please don't do this too much as it increases the judging time :P). The cutoff for edits or resubmits is the same as the contest closing.
: yeah you are probably right, but with 1 day left i doubt a fix and im missing missions so :( my beta rewards go down the toilet
Beta points aren't a finite resource though? You get the orb daily and a new mission set weekly. You only lose out on 50 pts which isn't much in the grand scheme of things. It's not like you'll even be behind since no-one else can complete it either.
Mirrow (OCE)
: Will there be any more prestige skins unlocked using 100 prestige points?
There will be more yes, but we won't have any details in advance.
Papega (OCE)
: So due to context being a major factor in this ban does it not seem reasonable to review it? All I'm trying to say is that whilst I'm not perfect this ban isn't fully justified. Is there a chance we could converse via email so that I might understand what I must do in order to have this account un-banned. many thanks for your response, Papega.
You are more than welcome to have the community review your punishment, but to do so we need the whole picture (chat logs). If the ban was not made in error then there is no way to retrieve your account. We can't say anything for certain, that's up to the discretion of player support as HeartVine mentioned, but we can offer advice and context on the punishment *if* you give us the full details (i.e the chat logs).
: its broken, they dont mean round 11, they mean round 7, which is only possibly with some bs pirate luck, about 5% chance
Pretty sure they mean round 11, but it seems it was misconfigured to round 7 (counting the round robin at the start and the first shared draft). It's almost certainly not working as intended since no-one can really complete it. It'll either be fixed soon or they'll just roll over to next week's missions and not worry about it.
: My guess is that the way the mission is programmed it's before the FIRST shared draft, me and a friend deliberately tried to complete this quest, and got to level 6 the round after the first carousel with 3 gold left and 3 gold on the board, so it's just impossible outside of early pirates and getting really lucky on a gold drop.
That was my guess too, but it's obviously not working as intended. Given that GP is blue getting the 3 pirates that early is extremely unlikely so we can't even confirm such a method as a workaround. Hopefully they get it sorted soon.
: > [{quoted}](name=Seras Dragon,realm=OCE,application-id=ElA0rvVL,discussion-id=pGJmBWOw,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2019-07-05T11:36:19.718+0000) > > So unless I'm missing some special offer, $10 gets you 920RP + bonus 80RP to equal 1000RP all up. Wait i thought the 920 + 80 RP was the whole bonus. Are you saying that I'm purchasing 920RP with (80 RP bonus)? I thought it was 1k plus the 920+80RP bonus. If so I'm either really dumb if IM the only one thinking that
920 is the amount you are buying and 80 is the bonus you get for buying 'in bulk'. It's 920 (+80 Bonus) not a bonus of 920+80. The RP to $ ratio has dropped relatively recently to account for the new taxes on digital goods applied by the AUS and NZ (and many other countries) governments.
: Purchasing RPS Not received
So unless I'm missing some special offer, $10 gets you 920RP + bonus 80RP to equal 1000RP all up.
Joyb22 (OCE)
: Yeah, that's understandable. I've heard some cases where they don't even consider recovering the account because they might think that the original user had done the punishable actions which is kind of my worry too.
If you didn't do the thing, normally the only reason that would disqualify you from recovery is if you share or have shared your account. As soon as account sharing comes into the mix you lose a lot of the protections a secure account has. It is of course up to support's discretion, for example, if you've been compromised multiple times that may also disqualify you from further recoveries. That kind of thing.
: League of legends OCE is anyone else having issues ??
There seems to be some connection drama in general. I'm getting the ol' "skip waiting for stats" which I haven't seen in ages and some web-based client assets are real slow to load. I don't think it's just League. There was a big (but shortlived) DDoS on a lot of services on the 1st, possible it's happening again.
OhDeer (OCE)
: "a player-triggered review found your in-game comms extremely inflammatory and offensive, your account's been pemanently suspended."
Presumably, that came with a chat log. You cannot receive a permanent suspension for chat without receiving at least a 14-day suspension first. About the only exception might be if there were serious threats involved. If you believe you have not received a 14-day ban in the past, then follow HeartVine's advice and follow through the player support process: https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/requests/new
OhDeer (OCE)
: ive never gotten a 14-day ban or any warning
Then what was the stated reason for the ban?
Show more

Seras Dragon

Level 150 (OCE)
Lifetime Upvotes
Create a Discussion